Connecticut Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 436
Lego System A/S v. Rubicon Communications, LP
as 3:2015cv00823
Plaintiff:
Lego System A/S
Defendant:
Rubicon Communications, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Huang v. Harbor Freight USA Tools Inc
as 3:2015cv00738
Plaintiff:
Han-Ching Huang
Defendant:
Harbor Freight USA Tools Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Huang v. Harbor Freight USA Tools Inc
as 2:2015cv00738
Plaintiff:
Han-Huang Huang
Defendant:
Harbor Freight USA Tools Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Benedetti v. University of Connecticut et al
as 3:2015cv00679
Plaintiff:
George W. Benedetti
Defendant:
University of Connecticut and Center for Science and Technology Commercialization
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Whelen Engineering Co Inc v. Viviox et al
as 3:2015cv00508
Plaintiff:
Whelen Engineering Co Inc
Defendant:
Viviox, Abe Y. Haas, Ben S. Hoff and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Eveready Battery Co Inc et al v. Dorco USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00493
Plaintiff:
Eveready Battery Co Inc and Schick Manufacturing, Inc.
Defendant:
Dorco USA, Inc. and Pace Shave
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jacobs Vehicle Sys Inc. v. FCA US LLC
as 3:2015cv00350
Plaintiff:
Jacobs Vehicle Sys Inc
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Smith's Consumer Products Inc. v. Wusthof-Trident of America, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00242
Plaintiff:
Smith's Consumer Products Inc.
Defendant:
Wusthof-Trident of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Protegrity USA, Inc. et al v. Netskope, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00230
Plaintiff:
Protegrity USA, Inc. and Protegrity Corporation
Defendant:
Netskope, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Protegrity USA, Inc. et al v. Vaultive, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00232
Plaintiff:
Protegrity USA, Inc. and Protegrity Corporation
Defendant:
Vaultive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
