Connecticut Other Statutes Cases

Other Statutory Actions Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 91 - 100 of 1,762
In Re: Appointment of CJA Attorney
as 3:2023mc00066
In Re: Request from Ukraine Pursuant to the Treaty on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters
as 3:2023mc00064
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Application For Order
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Adams v. Abeo North America Inc.
as 3:2023mc00063
Plaintiff: Arch Adams
Defendant: Abeo North America Inc.
Petitioner: Woodbridge International
In Re: Sandoz Canada Inc.et al
as 3:2023mc00059
In Re: Sandoz Canada Inc. and Sun Pharma Canada, Inc. and Sun Pharma Canada Inc
Petitioner: Sandoz Canada Inc
Not Classified By Court: Danping Li, Leo John Seman, Leon Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In Re: Appointment of FPD/CJA Attorney
as 3:2023mc00060
Scott v. Scott
as 3:2023mc00058
Petitioner: Joseph W. Scott, II
Respondent: Michele L. Scott
Nolet v. APS Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2023mc00042
Plaintiff: Kim Nolet, Deborah Fox, Gervon Fox and others
Defendant: APS Solutions, Inc.
Sastrom v. Connecticut Psychaitric Security Review Baord
as 3:2023cv00846
Plaintiff: Roy Sastrom
Defendant: Connecticut Psychiatric Security Review Board and Connecticut Psychaitric Security Review Baord
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Care One, LLC et al v. National Labor Relations Board et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00831
Plaintiff: Care One, LLC, Healthbridge Management, LLC, Care Realty, LLC and others
Defendant: National Labor Relations Board, Lauren McFerran, Gwynne Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Rzeczka v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2023cv00825
Plaintiff: Matthew Rzeczka
Defendant: General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?