Delaware Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,981
Cirwithian v. Emig et al
as 1:2025cv00379
Petitioner:
Joshua Cirwithian
Respondent:
Brian Emig and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGriff v. Emig et al
as 1:2025cv00360
Petitioner:
Joshua D. McGriff
Respondent:
Brian Emig and The Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiggins v. Parker et al
as 1:2025cv00337
Plaintiff:
Nakia U. Wiggins
Defendant:
Parker, Natasha Hollingsworth, Charge Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpkins v. Sade et al
as 1:2025cv00327
Defendant:
Sade, Donald Hayman, Shardee and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Tyrone Simpkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Neil v. Marsh et al
as 1:2025cv00317
Plaintiff:
Jason T. O'Neil
Defendant:
Kris Marsh, Dale Corrici, Jesus Paz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkell v. Parker et al
as 1:2025cv00319
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Parkell
Defendant:
Warden Phillip Parker, John Doe, Dave Chaplain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Davis et al
as 1:2025cv00292
Petitioner:
Julian Ezra Williams
Respondent:
Theresa Davis and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reeves v. Lynch et al
as 1:2025cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kalif A. Reeves
Defendant:
Kevin Lynch, Hunter West, Marvella Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartell v. Emig et al
as 1:2025cv00242
Petitioner:
Mark Bartell
Respondent:
Brian Emig and Kathy Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Haymond v. Oettel et al
as 1:2025cv00234
Plaintiff:
Augustine A. Haymond, Jr. and Auggie
Defendant:
Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
