US District Court for the District of Columbia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,531
NABIZADA v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv02906
Plaintiff:
KAMALUDDIN NABIZADA
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JANET YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
EMIABATA v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY et al
as 1:2023cv02857
Plaintiff:
PHILIP EMIABATA
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, 4. AVAIL., LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VANDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2023cv02812
Plaintiff:
VANDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Defendant:
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ROBERT M. CALIFF, M.D., DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY v. NAVAJO TRANSITIONAL ENERGY COMPANY
as 1:2023mc00094
Petitioner:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Respondent:
NAVAJO TRANSITIONAL ENERGY COMPANY
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2023ml01789
In Re:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2023ml01788
In Re:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MUSSINGTON et al v. DEBORAH BROSNAN & ASSOCIATES, LLC
as 1:2023mc00093
Petitioner:
JOHN MUSSINGTON, JACKLYN FRANK and LESLIE THOMAS KC
Respondent:
DEBORAH BROSNAN & ASSOCIATES, LLC
ESTATE OF ALICE HOGLAN et al. v. THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al.
as 1:2023mc00091
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ALICE HOGLAN et al.
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
