US District Court for the District of Columbia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 9,812
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml00579
Not Yet Classified:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PETWAY v. TRANSUNION
as 1:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
JACQULINE PETWAY
Defendant:
TRANSUNION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FRESENIUS KABI USA, LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
FRESENIUS KABI USA, LLC
Defendant:
CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, XAVIER BECERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
WALKER v. 2100 2ND ST SW, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
ANGELICA WALKER
Defendant:
2100 2nd ST SW, LLC and Thomas Wilbur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
OSAGE NATION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, et al
as 1:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
OSAGE NATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and DEB HAALAND
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
as 1:2024mc00034
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
MARONG LIU and NO PARTY
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and ALISSA L. EMMEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD PAZOKI and NO PARTY
Not Yet Classified:
ANTONY BLINKEN, DOUGLASS BENNING, CHIP LAITINEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SHABAZZ v. D.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES VETERANS PROGRAM
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
KWAME L. SHABAZZ
Defendant:
D.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES VETERANS PROGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
