US District Court for the Middle District of Florida Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,366
Keys v. Chep Services LLC
as 3:2024cv01261
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keys
Defendant:
Chep Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Coulter v. Brown & Brown, Inc.
as 8:2024cv02812
Plaintiff:
Trevor Coulter
Defendant:
Brown & Brown, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Buttino v. Tiffany and Company U.S. Sales, LLC
as 6:2024cv02188
Plaintiff:
Dina Lynelle Buttino
Defendant:
Tiffany and Company U.S. Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Bell et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 8:2024cv02777
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Whisner, Jason Ewing, Andrew Brown and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Larkin v. Innovacare Partners, LLC
as 8:2024cv02785
Defendant:
Innovacare Partners, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sandra Larkin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Johnson v. LDRV Holdings Corp.
as 8:2024cv02753
Defendant:
LDRV Holdings Corp. doing business as LazyDays RV
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Armato-Barone v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 8:2024cv02692
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Filippo Armato-Barone
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Matdonado v. Trust Roofing, Inc.
as 8:2024cv02687
Plaintiff:
Francisco Matdonado
Defendant:
Trust Roofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Eubanks v. Aston Healthcare, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01041
Defendant:
Aston Healthcare, LLC and Woodside Operations, LLC
Plaintiff:
Beth Eubanks
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Campbell v. Suncoast Beverage Sales, LLC
as 2:2024cv01021
Plaintiff:
Tyree Campbell
Defendant:
Suncoast Beverage Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
