US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Labor Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,619
BUNCH v. BEACHSIDE BINGO INC et al
as 3:2021cv01316
Plaintiff: JAMES BUNCH
Defendant: BEACHSIDE BINGO INC, RONALD D STROBO, WILLIAM R PERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BYRON v. BIGTOP BINGO INC et al
as 3:2021cv01221
Plaintiff: KYLE S BYRON
Defendant: BIGTOP BINGO INC, JM GOODSON LLC, TRACY GOODSON and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PRICE v. BIGTOP BINGO INC et al
as 3:2021cv01191
Plaintiff: AMANDA PRICE
Defendant: BIGTOP BINGO INC, JM GOODSON LLC, TRACY GOODSON and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BROWNING v. SCOOTERS INC d/ba SCOOTERS FISH HOUSE et al
as 3:2021cv01158
Plaintiff: CORTNEY BROWNING
Defendant: SCOOTERS INC d/ba SCOOTERS FISH HOUSE, SAMUEL S TAYLOR and VERNON DIEDRICH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BROWN-NETTLES v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 3:2021cv01154
Plaintiff: SHAVON J BROWN-NETTLES
Defendant: LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
KERSH v. BIGTOP BINGO INC et al
as 3:2021cv01149
Plaintiff: CRYSTAL KERSH
Defendant: BIGTOP BINGO INC, JM GOODSON LLC, TRACY GOODSON and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CLIFTON v. SACRED HEART HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
as 3:2021cv01127
Plaintiff: BRANDY CLIFTON
Defendant: SACRED HEART HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. doing business as ASCENSION SACRED HEART
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
DYAL v. STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
as 4:2021cv00396
Plaintiff: DANIELLE DYAL
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act
MARSHALL v. ROWE ROOFING INC
as 4:2021cv00394
Plaintiff: Oz Marshall
Defendant: Rowe Roofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Fair Labor Standards Act
ANDERSON v. LOWES HOME CENTERS LLC
as 5:2021cv00186
Plaintiff: GILL ANDERSON
Defendant: LOWES HOME CENTERS LLC
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?