US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 846
Dakota Blenders
as 5:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Dakota Blenders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
MCMILLAN v. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY et al
as 5:2024cv00235
Defendant:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLOON CORPORATION and AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY R MCMILLAN
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
BOSTICK v. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY et al
as 5:2024cv00231
Defendant:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION and AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA J BOSTICK
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
LAVENDER v. OPTOTRAFFIC LLC
as 5:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
DEMETRA LAVENDER
Defendant:
OPTOTRAFFIC LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LAVENDER v. OPTOTRAFFIC LLC
as 5:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
DEMETRA LAVENDER
Defendant:
OPTOTRAFFIC LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LAVENDER v. OPTOTRAFFIC LLC
as 5:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
DEMETRA LAVENDER
Defendant:
OPTOTRAFFIC LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
METZ v. DIVIDEND
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY METZ
Defendant:
DIVIDEND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
SOUTHSTATE BANK, N.A. v. F-5 VENTURES, INC. et al
as 5:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
SOUTHSTATE BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
F-5 VENTURES, INC., GREGORY ELLIS ROBBINS and SHANNON LYNN ROBBINS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
LEDFORD v. EBARLE MARKETING SERVICES INC. et al
as 5:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD LEDFORD
Defendant:
EBARLE MARKETING SERVICES INC. and SOLAR MOSAIC LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Non-Motor Vehicle
INTERNATIONAL RV MANUFACTURING LLC v. X-TREME OUTDOORS LLC
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL RV MANUFACTURING LLC
Defendant:
X-TREME OUTDOORS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
