U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 502
KOKENZIE v. TRUEACCORD CORP.
as 4:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY KOKENZIE
Defendant:
TRUEACCORD CORP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SMITH v. TRUEACCORD CORP
as 7:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
SHELLY SMITH
Defendant:
TRUEACCORD CORP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CASS v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
as 5:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
HOUSTON KYLE CASS
Defendant:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SANDS v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
as 5:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
JUDDIE SANDS
Defendant:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SPRAGGINS v. PENDRICK CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
as 5:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
LAUREN SPRAGGINS
Defendant:
PENDRICK CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, PENDRICK CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC and ABILITY RECOVERY SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
STOWE v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
as 5:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
STEVEN STOWE and STEVEN STOWE, JR
Defendant:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BOWDOIN et al v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
as 5:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN BOWDOIN and WILLIAM BOWDOIN
Defendant:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MITCHELL et al v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
PAULA MITCHELL, FRANKLIN MITCHELL and S. M.
Defendant:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
QUINN v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
as 5:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
NEYSA QUINN
Defendant:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CANSLER et al v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
as 5:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
AMY CANSLER, ANDREW CANSLER, CHRISTOPHER LANDERS and others
Defendant:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
