US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 124
Dishman v. Wise et al
as 7:2008cv00045
Plaintiff:
J. Donald Dishman and J. Donald Dishman
Defendant:
Robert H. Wise and Radiology Associates of Valdosta, P.C.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Cone et al v. Wagner et al
as 5:2008cv00017
Plaintiff:
Donna F. Cone, Donna F. Cone, Alton Cone and others
Defendant:
Elisabeth A. Wagner, Central Georgia Women's Healthcare, P.C. and Women's Healthcare of Middle Georgia, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Sibley v. United States of America
as 4:2007cv00184
Plaintiff:
Angela Sibley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Boone v. Medecon Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00213
Plaintiff:
Jesse Boone
Defendant:
Medecon Medical Services, Inc. and Donna Barfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Smith v. Fussell et al
as 1:2007cv00166
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Smith
Defendant:
Melvin L. Fussell and Urological Health Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wright v. Smurda
as 1:2007cv00073
Plaintiff:
LaToya Wright
Defendant:
Paul Smurda and Paul Smurda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Antoncic v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv00032
Plaintiff:
Emmie Jean Antoncic, Emmie Jean Antoncic and Emmie Jean Antoncic
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Spinalgraft Technologies, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Vason v. Sumter Regional Hospital Foundation, Inc. et al
as 1:2006cv00174
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Thompson v. Washington County Regional Medical Center Foundation, Inc. et al
as 5:2006cv00203
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
