US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Labor Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 439
WALTON v. CHEROKEE NATION RED WING LLC
as 4:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
DEBRA WALTON
Defendant:
CHEROKEE NATION RED WING LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CRUZ v. CENTMAX CORPORATION et al
as 3:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
CARLOS CRUZ
Defendant:
CENTMAX CORPORATION, TONY DILLARD and NINA GILBERT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
CLARKE v. FOUNDRY RESTAURANT CORPORATION OF ATHENS GEORGIA
as 3:2017cv00036
Plaintiff:
JEROME CLARKE
Defendant:
FOUNDRY RESTAURANT CORPORATION OF ATHENS GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SCOTT et al v. MILITARY R&R SOLUTIONS INC et al
as 4:2017cv00049
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DWAYNE SCOTT and RAEANNE NILSEN
Defendant:
MILITARY R&R SOLUTIONS INC, RICHARD WORSHAM and BRUCE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HODGES v. PUNHAM AND TUSHAR et al
as 1:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
ERICA HODGES
Defendant:
PUNHAM AND TUSHAR LLC and SARGIL PATEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MCINVALE v. KAR FOOD MART LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00031
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER L MCINVALE
Defendant:
KAR FOOD MART LLC and MIKE CHAWLA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
RUIZ v. WAL-MART STORES INC
as 4:2017cv00042
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC
Plaintiff:
LEONET RUIZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Martin et al v. Budd Properties, Inc. et al
as 7:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JOHN MARTIN, JR , NICKY TAMPAS , SAMUEL KEITH WALKER and others
Defendant:
BUDD PROPERTIES INC, BUDD COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE LLC, ROGER M BUDD, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CHRISTENSON v. COLUMBUS CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT et al
as 4:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
LANCE L. CHRISTENSON
Defendant:
COLUMBUS CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT and JEFF MEYER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GEIGER et al v. SANGHA HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA GEIGER and MICHAEL NIPPER
Defendant:
SANGHA HOSPITALITY, LLC and RUPINDER SANGHA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
