US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Labor Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 329
Williams v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 7:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
MAE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
KALCH v. UNITED HEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED
as 5:2017cv00214
Plaintiff:
STACY KALCH
Defendant:
UNITED HEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
RUMNEY v. BOMBARDIER AEROSPACE CORP et al
as 5:2017cv00169
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC, LEARJET INC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES A RUMNEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MONTGOMERY v. MATRIX ABSENCE MAMAGEMENT INC
as 1:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
VICTOR O MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
MATRIX ABSENCE MAMAGEMENT INC and CSM BAKERY SOLUTIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Billings v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS. CO.
as 4:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
KATRINA BILLINGS
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
KING v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E KING
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
DAY v. PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE CO
as 1:2016cv00233
Plaintiff:
GLENDA E DAY
Defendant:
PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE CO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
BLACKMON v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 5:2016cv00548
Plaintiff:
TOMEKA W. BLACKMON
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
LATTEN v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 5:2016cv00498
Plaintiff:
BARBARA ANN LATTEN
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Broadfoot v. Williams et al
as 7:2016cv00209
Petitioner:
DAMARIS S. BROADFOOT
Respondent:
TIFFNEY WILLIAMS, REBECCA BYNUM, BILLY JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
