U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23,210
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Edge Solutions, LLC v. Rojas et al
as 1:2025cv02674
Plaintiff:
Edge Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Mauricio Rojas, Stephen Obeck and Move Technology Partners Limited LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Wells Real Estate Investment, LLC et al
as 2:2025mi00002
Defendant:
Janalie C. Joseph, Martiniquea Investments LLC, Wells Real Estate Investment, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Appointment of Receiver
Appt. of Receiver
as 4:2025mi00001
Receiver:
Andres Rivero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Appointment of Receiver
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
App. of Receiver
as 1:2025mi00034
Receiver:
Andres Rivero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Appointment of Receiver
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
