District of Hawaii Prisoner Petitions Cases
General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 242
Manu v. Department of Homeland Security
as 1:2018cv00219
Petitioner:
Leoti Manu
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brisken v. Attorney General of the State of Hawaii
as 1:2018cv00163
Petitioner:
Jhon Nigel Brisken
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slavick v. Harrington
as 1:2018cv00142
Petitioner:
Christopher Slavick
Respondent:
warden Scott Harrington
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maddox v. Thomas
as 1:2018cv00133
Petitioner:
Mickey A. Maddox
Respondent:
Todd Thomas
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Deedy v. Suzuki et al
as 1:2018cv00094
Petitioner:
Christopher Deedy
Respondent:
Russell Suzuki , Keith M. Kaneshiro , Nolan Espinda
and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Berhane v. Warden, FCI Oakdale I
as 1:2018cv00093
Petitioner:
Aman Berhane
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Oakdale I
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mellinger v. US Probation Office
as 1:2018cv00069
Petitioner:
Daniel Mellinger
Respondent:
US Probation Office
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Barnes v. Ige et al
as 1:2018cv00034
Petitioner:
William Jackson Gay Barnes
Respondent:
Ige, Nolan Espinda, Francis Sequiera
and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Libero v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2017cv00497
Petitioner:
James K. Libero
Respondent:
State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Ornellas et al
as 1:2017cv00356
Petitioner:
Samuel Carter
Respondent:
Sean Ornellas, State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
