Idaho Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 836
Ware v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Brandy Lynn Ware
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dixon v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Amanda Luella Dixon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Gadbaw v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Dawn Gadbaw
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Gamache v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00309
Petitioner:
Rachel Christine Gamache
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Johnson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Devon Charles Johnson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fillis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00291
Petitioner:
Levi D. Fillis
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Clinger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Lacee Jo Clinger
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brady v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Jacey Lynae Brady
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Williams v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
J. Williams John and John J. Williams
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Empey v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Lance Paul Empey
Defendant:
Commission of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
