Pollock v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Howard William Pollock
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2024cv00477
Filed: October 10, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho
Presiding Judge: Amanda K Brailsford
Referring Judge: Debora K Grasham
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2024 Filing 10 Administrative Record by Franco Luciano Becia on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. (Becia, Franco)
October 24, 2024 Filing 9 DOCKET TEXT NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Franco Luciano Becia appearing for Commissioner of Social Security by Attorney (Becia, Franco)
October 22, 2024 Filing 8 DOCKET TEXT NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Peter L Wucetich appearing for Commissioner of Social Security by Attorney (Wucetich, Peter)
October 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham, referred for ALL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Amanda K Brailsford. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs)
October 18, 2024 Filing 6 REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO DISTRICT JUDGE AND REASSIGNMENT OF CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Amanda K Brailsford for all further proceedings. US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham no longer assigned to case. Please use this case number on all future pleadings, 1:24-cv-00477-AKB(hs)
October 11, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Howard William Pollock re #1 Complaint for Review of Social Security. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 11/1/2024. (hs)
October 11, 2024 Filing 4 DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE - Notice of Filing of Complaint seeking review under 42 U.S.C. 405(g)- re #1 Complaint for Review of Social Security. Caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs)
October 11, 2024 Filing 3 PROCEDURAL ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs)
October 10, 2024 Filing 2 Statement of Social Security Number by Howard William Pollock This is a sealed document.. (Parkinson, Brad)
October 10, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR REVIEW OF SOCIAL SECURITY (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AIDDC-2824869.), filed by Howard William Pollock. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeal Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Parkinson, Brad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pollock v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Howard William Pollock
Represented By: Brad D Parkinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Peter L Wucetich
Represented By: Franco Luciano Becia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?