US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Philippi-Hagenbuch Inc et al v. Western Technology Services International Inc
as 1:2012cv01099
Plaintiff:
Philippi-Hagenbuch Inc and LeRoy G Hagenbuch
Defendant:
Western Technology Services International Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hagenbuch v. Komatsu America, Incorporated
as 1:2012cv01079
Plaintiff:
LeRoy G Hagenbuch
Defendant:
Komatsu America, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois v. Micron Technology Inc
as 2:2011cv02288
Defendant:
Micron Technology Inc
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Dawn Equipment Company v. Ag Focus, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01428
Plaintiff:
Dawn Equipment Company
Defendant:
Ag Focus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Marotta v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2011cv01306
Plaintiff:
Dario A. Marotta
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Brostron v. The Advance Metalworking Company
as 4:2011cv04014
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brostron
Defendant:
The Advance Metalworking Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mikityanskiy v. Thermionics, Inc.
as 3:2011cv03006
Plaintiff:
Leonid Mikityanskiy
Defendant:
Thermionics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arkansas County Seed Co Inc v. Williams et al
as 1:2010cv01231
Plaintiff:
Arkansas County Seed Co Inc
Defendant:
Karl L Williams and John Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Martin Engineering Company v. ASGCO Mfg., Inc.
as 1:2010cv01189
Plaintiff:
Martin Engineering Company
Defendant:
ASGCO Mfg., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Martin Engineering Company v. ASGCO Mfg., Inc.
as 1:2010cv01190
Plaintiff:
Martin Engineering Company
Defendant:
ASGCO Mfg., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
