US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 496
Cassaday v. 3M Company
as 4:2024cv04173
Plaintiff:
Brandi Cassaday
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Notice of Removal
Deufel v. 3M Company
as 4:2024cv04174
Defendant:
3M Company
Plaintiff:
Donna Deufel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Gordon v. Smith
as 1:2024cv01343
Defendant:
Marc Smith
Plaintiff:
Samuel Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bovard v. Hospital Sisters Health System
as 3:2024cv03261
Plaintiff:
Charles Bovard
Defendant:
Hospital Sisters Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McCoy v. Hospital Sisters Health System
as 3:2024cv03253
Plaintiff:
Sandra McCoy
Defendant:
Hospital Sisters Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McIntyre v. Community Alternatives of Illinois
as 2:2024cv02209
Plaintiff:
Sandra McIntyre
Defendant:
Community Alternatives of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Wrongful Death
Mejia v. Walmart Inc.
as 1:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Magdalena Mejia
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cullen v. Kunes Country Automotive Management Inc et al
as 4:2024cv04153
Defendant:
Kunes Country Automotive Management Inc doing business as Kunes Auto Group and Kunes Ford of East Moline Inc
Plaintiff:
Buddy Cullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Cosenza v. A.M.E. Engineering, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01276
Defendant:
A.M.E. Engineering, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christie Cosenza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cosenza v. A.M.E. Engineering, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01277
Plaintiff:
Christie Cosenza
Defendant:
A.M.E. Engineering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
