US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,445
Ware-Mustapha v. Counselor Brown
as 4:2023cv04182
Petitioner:
Eric Ware-Mustapha
Respondent:
Counselor Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Williams
as 4:2023cv04179
Petitioner:
Tracy E. Johnson
Respondent:
Tarry Williams
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Galloway v. Bennett
as 1:2023cv01389
Petitioner:
Beth Galloway
Respondent:
Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Armando v. Warden of USP Thomson
as 4:2023cv04177
Petitioner:
Ibarra Medina Armando
Respondent:
Warden of USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Soto v. Maldonado
as 4:2023cv04175
Petitioner:
Carlos Gutierrez Soto
Respondent:
R Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Celcid v. Maldonado
as 4:2023cv04176
Plaintiff:
Jose Fredy Celcid
Defendant:
R Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turner v. Bennett
as 2:2023cv02218
Petitioner:
Nekia Turner
Respondent:
Warden Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cadenas v. Maldonado
as 4:2023cv04166
Plaintiff:
Robert Cadenas
Defendant:
R Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dida v. State of Illinois
as 1:2023cv01375
Petitioner:
Dida Mohamed Abduba and Mohamed Dida
Respondent:
State of Illinois
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belton v. USA
as 1:2023cv01370
Petitioner:
Emanucel Belton
Respondent:
USA and Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
