US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 119
United States of America v. One Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Nine and 00/100 Dollars et al
as 1:2011cv01074
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Nine and 00/100 Dollars and One Thousand and 00/100 Dollars
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
United States of America v. 2007 GMC VIN1GKFK66827J171166
as 3:2010cv03267
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2007 GMC VIN1GKFK66827J171166
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v $13500 in US Currency
as 4:2010cv04063
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$13500 in US Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 13684 US Currency
as 1:2010cv01217
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
13684 US Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 2005 Dodge VIN #3D3LS38C05G703969
as 3:2010cv03156
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2005 Dodge VIN #3D3LS38C05G703969
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $101,000 US Currency
as 4:2010cv04047
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$101,000 US Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
USA v. $25640 US Currency et al
as 2:2010cv02122
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$25640 US Currency and $5908 US Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $5740 US Currency
as 3:2010cv03078
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$5740 US Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $11491 US Currency
as 1:2010cv01064
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$11491 US Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $19000 US Currency
as 3:2010cv03009
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$19000 US Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.