US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,855
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv03793
Petitioner:
Carlos Manuel Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Condon v. Wills
as 3:2023cv03747
Petitioner:
Andrew Condon
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mannering v. Lillard
as 3:2023cv03666
Petitioner:
Matthew Robert Mannering
Respondent:
Thomas Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Escalada v. USA
as 3:2023cv03645
Petitioner:
Stephen Bernard Escalada
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parker v. Stempenski
as 3:2023cv03617
Petitioner:
Christopher Parker
Respondent:
Rich Stempenski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hendricks v. Stempenski
as 3:2023cv03596
Petitioner:
Scott A Hendricks
Respondent:
Rich Stempenski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. People of the State of Illinois
as 3:2023cv03258
Petitioner:
Eric S. Smith
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayden v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv03251
Petitioner:
Richard T Hayden
Respondent:
Latoya Hughes, Cherryle Hinthorne and Kwame Raoule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardner v. Brookhart
as 3:2023cv03231
Petitioner:
DeShawn Gardner
Respondent:
Deanna M. Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holt v. USA
as 3:2023cv03249
Petitioner:
Larry Joseph Holt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
