US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,401
Shabazz v. French et al
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Malik Shabazz
Defendant:
C/O French and C/O Hollis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Shoenbeck et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Elliott Robinson
Defendant:
Lt Shoenbeck, C/O Rivera, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Artis v. Michell et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Montez Artis
Defendant:
David Michell, Hill, Briann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Fox et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Shaune Burns
Defendant:
Parole Agent Fox, Brooke Settle, Parole Agent Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gresham v. Rohan et al
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
James Gresham
Defendant:
Officer Rohan, Officer Triffio and City of Marion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv04066
Plaintiff:
Blake Wilson
Defendant:
Warden Wills, Lewey, Lt. Royster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manley v. Babich et al
as 3:2023cv03982
Plaintiff:
Douglas L. Manley
Defendant:
Dr Babich, Rachell Dodd, Mr. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Brumleve et al
as 3:2023cv03959
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Sergeant Brumleve, Jilian Crane, L. Krondo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuson v. Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv03913
Plaintiff:
Terrance Tuson
Defendant:
State of Illinois and IDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv03877
Plaintiff:
Travius Kentrell Tucker
Defendant:
USA, State of Illinois and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
