US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Labor Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Harris v. Panther City Hauling, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00337
Plaintiff:
Seth D Harris
Defendant:
Panther City Hauling, Inc., Perry Ridge Landfill, Inc. and Joseph Mazza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Barbeau v. Weekends Only, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00219
Plaintiff:
Justin Barbeau
Defendant:
Weekends Only, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
O'Leary v. Heidtman Steel Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01059
Plaintiff:
Kevin O'Leary
Defendant:
Heidtman Steel Products, Inc. and Mark Hessler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doty v. Kenworth of St. Louis, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01039
Plaintiff:
Louis Doty
Defendant:
Kenworth of St. Louis, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Evans v. Contract Callers, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01024
Plaintiff:
Tab Evans
Defendant:
Contract Callers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wright v. Portrait Innovations
as 3:2012cv00966
Defendant:
Portrait Innovations
Plaintiff:
Christin K Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nichols v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 50
as 3:2012cv00853
Plaintiff:
Patrick Nichols
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 50
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Austin et al v. Bechtel Construction Company
as 3:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Scott Austin , Jarrod Kilmurray , Christopher Davis and others
Defendant:
Bechtel Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Ross v. Gibco Motor Express, LLC
as 3:2012cv00184
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ross
Defendant:
Gibco Motor Express, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Varel v. Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation
as 3:2012cv00103
Plaintiff:
Albert Varel
Defendant:
Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
