US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 75
United States of America v. Barringer Brothers Roofing, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00897
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Barringer Brothers Roofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Terrell v. Suiza Dairy Group, LLC
as 3:2011cv00888
Plaintiff:
Gregory Terrell
Defendant:
Suiza Dairy Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. Norfolk Southern Railroad Company
as 3:2011cv00606
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Gonzalez
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
62SGAC, Inc. v. Strickland et al
as 3:2010cv00839
Plaintiff:
62SGAC, Inc.
Defendant:
Todd Strickland and Compass Rose Events, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. The Housing Authority of the City of East St. Louis
as 3:2010cv00800
Plaintiff:
Mario D. Alexander
Defendant:
The Housing Authority of the City of East St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deadmond v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2010cv00677
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Deadmond
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Davis
as 3:2010cv00275
Petitioner:
Sean Jones
Respondent:
Randy J Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reynolds v. Division of Aeronautics et al
as 3:2008cv00415
Plaintiff:
Atrella R. Reynolds
Defendant:
Division of Aeronautics, Susan Shea, Terrisa Lashmett and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White v. Dynamic Educational Systems, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00474
Plaintiff:
Yoshiko White
Defendant:
Dynamic Educational Systems, Inc. and Dynamic Educational Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Phelps v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00243
Plaintiff:
Shannon Phelps and Christopher Dale Hanneken
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Sam's East Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
