Illinois Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,009
Bochian v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv06541
Plaintiff:
Ina Bochian
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wills v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv06490
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Wills
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Shah v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv06275
Plaintiff:
Chirag H. Shah
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lewis v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv06205
Plaintiff:
Veronica Michele Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gabel v. Social Security
as 1:2024cv06156
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
John H Gabel, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Friedrich v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02169
Plaintiff:
Felicia Friedrich
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Cortez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv06101
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kira Marie Cortez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dyer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01252
Plaintiff:
Jordan Nicole Dyer
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cameron v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv06071
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Cameron
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Manewith v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50307
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Ryan A. Manewith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
