Illinois Social Security Cases

Disability Insurance Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 21 - 30 of 3,413
Gillespie v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00818
Plaintiff: Terri E. Gillespie
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Schwegel v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00814
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSAOGC
Plaintiff: Michael J. Schwegel
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ryba v. Saul
as 1:2019cv04970
Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff: Ronald J Ryba
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Goffron v. Saul
as 1:2019cv04987
Plaintiff: Donna M. Goffron
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bare v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00797
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Marjorie I. Bare
Interested Party: SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Grant v. Saul
as 1:2019cv04954
Plaintiff: Dana Grant
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00793
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Amber K. Jones
Interested Party: SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rodriguez v. Saul
as 1:2019cv04854
Plaintiff: Sylvia E Rodriguez
Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Townsend v. Saul
as 1:2019cv04859
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Patricia A. Townsend
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Penny v. Saul
as 1:2019cv04852
Plaintiff: Natalie S Penny
Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?