US District Court for the District of Kansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 2,105
Franco-Monserrate (ID 119567) v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv03161
Petitioner:
Juan Gilberto Franco-Monserrate
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chanthaseng (ID 92455) v. Langford
as 5:2022cv03159
Petitioner:
Phouthavy Chanthaseng
Respondent:
Donald Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas (ID 80566) v. Cheeks
as 5:2022cv03150
Petitioner:
Matthew R. Thomas
Respondent:
Chandler Cheeks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Evans v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2022cv03147
Petitioner:
Zabriel Leon Evans
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mays v. Hudson
as 5:2022cv03142
Petitioner:
Shannon Tecoko Mays
Respondent:
Donald Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barnes (ID 91619) v. Cheeks
as 5:2022cv03138
Petitioner:
Anthony R. Barnes
Respondent:
Chandler Cheeks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chambers v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv03137
Petitioner:
Roscoe Chambers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gaines (ID 62509) v. Zmuda
as 5:2022cv03134
Petitioner:
Ernest Gaines
Respondent:
Jeff Zmuda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barber (ID 43901) v. Cheeks
as 5:2022cv03130
Petitioner:
Robert E. Barber
Respondent:
Chandler Cheeks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson (ID 124179) v. Schnurr
as 5:2022cv03131
Petitioner:
Jujuan M. Gibson
Respondent:
Dan Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.