US District Court for the District of Kansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 1,061
Woods (ID 77647) v. Crow et al
as 5:2022cv03190
Plaintiff:
Kishen Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Sam Crow and Korey A. Kaul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Chahine et al
as 5:2022cv03193
Plaintiff:
John Timothy Price
Defendant:
Hatem Chahine, Jerry Wells and Josh Luttrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods (ID 77647) v. Crow et al
as 5:2022cv03191
Plaintiff:
Kishen Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Sam Crow, Korey A. Kaul, (fnu) Lolly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Hayden
as 5:2022cv03172
Plaintiff:
Nicholas D'Andre Thomas
Defendant:
Ryan Hayden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins (ID 70273) v. Woods
as 5:2022cv03167
Plaintiff:
Roger Allen Collins, Jr.
Defendant:
Rodger Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbs v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2022cv03162
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Avery Dobbs
Defendant:
State of Kansas, Atchison County Sheriff's Department, Jesse Noll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tallie v. Pittsburg Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv03152
Plaintiff:
Joseph N. Tallie
Defendant:
Pittsburg Police Department, Adan Nance, Lori Bolton-Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cloud v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2022cv03146
Plaintiff:
Sharon Cloud
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Mandi Stephenson, Richard N. Raleigh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Hayden
as 5:2022cv03143
Plaintiff:
Nicholas D'Andre Thomas
Defendant:
Ryan Hayden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooley v. Douglas County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2022cv03141
Plaintiff:
Tony Allen Cooley
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff's Department and R. Zimbicky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.