US District Court for the District of Kansas Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,573
Thurman v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv02425
Plaintiff:
Jordan Thurman
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Timms v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv02419
Plaintiff:
Verlon Timms, Sr.
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Chapman v. Lowen Corporation
as 2:2023cv02396
Plaintiff:
Charles Chapman
Defendant:
Lowen Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Williamson v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02392
Plaintiff:
Andy T. L. Williamson
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. Kansas City Life Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv02381
Plaintiff:
Justin Smith
Defendant:
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ahmadi v. Mid-West Educational Center, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02376
Plaintiff:
Parrre Ann Ahmadi
Defendant:
Mid-West Educational Center, Inc.
Nunez v. Aspen Lawn Care, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02338
Plaintiff:
Eric Nunez
Defendant:
Aspen Lawn Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Turner v. Dunkin
as 2:2023cv02316
Plaintiff:
William B. Turner
Defendant:
James Dunkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Seifert v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
as 2:2023cv02314
Plaintiff:
Cathryn Seifert
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ellefson et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 6:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
Russell Ellefson and Joshua Zongker
Defendant:
General Electric Company and GE Layoff Plan for Salaried Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
