Kansas Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 95
USD 267 Renwick v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02711
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
USD 267 Renwick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USD 405 Lyons v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02708
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Unified School District No. 405, Rice County, Kansas and USD 405 Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USD 265 Goddard v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02705
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
USD 265 Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USD 512 Shawnee Mission v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02663
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Unified School District No. 512, Johnson County, Kansas and USD 512 Shawnee Mission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USD 229 Blue Valley v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02662
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Unified School District No. 229, Johnson County, State of Kansas and USD 229 Blue Valley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USD 232 De Soto v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02631
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
USD 232 De Soto
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
USD 333 Concordia v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02621
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Concordia Public Schools Unified School District No. 333 and USD 333 Concordia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
USD 233 Olathe v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02608
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
USD 233 Olathe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Taylor v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv02596
Defendant:
Actavis Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
William Taylor
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Eye Works, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02572
Plaintiff:
John Fultz and Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Eye Works, Inc. and Cheryl Gibson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
