US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 960
Hager v. Dill
as 0:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Franklin H. Hager
Defendant:
Gordon J. Dill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Washington v. Quick et al
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Victor Washington
Defendant:
Joseph Quick, Hot Shot Express, Inc. and Trucking Investments Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shoopman et al v. VOD Transport, LLC et al
as 6:2022cv00001
Executor:
Justin Michael Shoopman and Sandra Partin
Plaintiff:
S.P. and N.P.
Defendant:
VOD Transport, LLC, United Parcel Service, Inc., Syfan Logistics, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilson v. TQT, LLC et al
as 6:2021cv00200
Plaintiff:
William S. Wilson
Defendant:
TQT, LLC and Vasko Kiteski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fryman v. Dawson et al
as 2:2021cv00157
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Fryman
Defendant:
Terry Dawson and KBT Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Grigsby et al v. Hatfield et al
as 7:2021cv00096
Plaintiff:
Warren G. Grigsby and Kathy Cline
Defendant:
Stanley G. Hatfield and Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chinn v. Morgan et al
as 2:2021cv00144
Plaintiff:
Paulette Chinn
Defendant:
William Morgan and Morgan Farms Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murphy v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 5:2021cv00282
Plaintiff:
Dallas Murphy
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Next Insurance US Company and GEICO General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones et al v. Thomas et al
as 6:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
Douglas Jones
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Daryl R. Thomas and Petoskey Plastics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Singleton v. Baldwin et al
as 6:2021cv00180
Plaintiff:
Neil Singleton
Defendant:
Fred T. Baldwin and Woods Brothers Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
