US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,321
Robbins v. Sam's East Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv00005
Defendant:
Sam's East Inc. and Walmart Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Robbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hughes v. UofL Health-Louisville, Inc.
as 3:2025cv00003
Plaintiff:
Michael Hughes
Defendant:
UofL Health-Louisville, Inc. doing business as UofL Health-Jewish Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hawks v. Hines Furlong Line, Inc. et al.
as 5:2024cv00195
Respondent:
HFL Vessels LLC and Hines Furlong Line, Inc.
Petitioner:
Lee Hawks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Elkins v. ABM Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00719
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant and ABM Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Walter Elkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Wood v. Sage
as 5:2024cv00185
Defendant:
Zachary Sage
Plaintiff:
Paul Frederick Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Rice v. Panera, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00712
Defendant:
Panera, LLC
Plaintiff:
Diane Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Cornelius v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 3:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Korry Cornelius
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Graves v. Amack Brake
as 1:2024cv00143
Defendant:
Amack Brake
Plaintiff:
Perry Graves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boddie v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 3:2024cv00690
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I and The Kroger Co.
Plaintiff:
Lesley Boddie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Vance v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Douglas Vance
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.