US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 2,445
Gallimore v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv00034
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Gallimore
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Booker et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv00033
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Booker and Tammy Booker
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2018cv00838
Plaintiff:
Marcia Barnes and Robert Barnes
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trotter et al v. Frontline Equipment, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00174
Defendant:
Paul Arbogast and Frontline Equipment, LLC
Plaintiff:
Dave E. Trotter and Brendi Jennifer Trotter
Undetermined:
PMA Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Duckwall v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00713
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Joyce S. Duckwall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nelson v. DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00675
Plaintiff:
Frank Nelson
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation, aap Implants, Stryker Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Swift Response, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00628
Defendant:
PLZ Aeroscience, Inc., Lowe's Home Centers, LLC and Swift Response, LLC
Plaintiff:
David Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gipe v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00584
Defendant:
Greenhaven Apartments, Unomedical Devices SA DE CV, Medtronic Minimed, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Teresa Gipe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lp
Hayden et al v. Monsanto Company
as 5:2018cv00128
Plaintiff:
Ruth Hayden and Francis Eugene Hayden
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2018cv00502
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Young and Sarah Mae Young
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
