Kentucky Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 298
Brett Construction Co. v. Habash et al
as 5:2011cv00355
Plaintiff:
Brett Construction Co.
Defendant:
Tessa Habash and Keffa Habash
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Garden Meadow, Inc v. Bond Manufacturing Co.
as 3:2011cv00597
Plaintiff:
Garden Meadow, Inc
Defendant:
Bond Manufacturing Co. and John Does 1-99
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Garden Meadow, Inc v. Winston Brands, Inc
as 3:2011cv00561
Plaintiff:
Garden Meadow, Inc
Defendant:
Winston Brands, Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Holley Performance Products, Inc. v. Prestolite Performance LLC
as 1:2011cv00137
Plaintiff:
Holley Performance Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Prestolite Performance LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. GT Holdings, LLC et al
as 5:2011cv00149
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Universal Songs of Polygram International, Inc. , Concord Music Group, Inc and others
Defendant:
GT Holdings, LLC, Burton W. Gregory, Timothy S. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Boy Racer Inc. v. Does 1-10
as 3:2011cv00492
Plaintiff:
Boy Racer Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
AF HOLDINGS LLC v. Does 1 through 20
as 3:2011cv00491
Plaintiff:
AF HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant:
Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
The Bandana Co., Inc. v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
The Bandana Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and John Does 1-99
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
The Bandana Co., Inc. v. Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00375
Plaintiff:
The Bandana Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. and John Does 1-99
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Strategic Marketing, Inc. v. Fitzpatrick Advertising, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00351
Plaintiff:
Strategic Marketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Fitzpatrick Advertising, LLC , The Car Ad Store, LLC and Force Events and Direct Marketing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
