U.S. District Court for the District of Maine Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 323
HYLTON v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2025cv00319
Plaintiff:
SARA HYLTON
Defendant:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
HAMILTON v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2025cv00286
Plaintiff:
TORI HAMILTON
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MOORE v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2025cv00263
Plaintiff:
RIAN MOORE
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
SHORTHILL v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2025cv00264
Plaintiff:
SUSAN SHORTHILL
Defendant:
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
HOOD v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2025cv00265
Plaintiff:
CASEY HOOD
Defendant:
MUTUAL OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
DOE v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2025cv00259
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
KELLY v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2025cv00261
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JOHN KELLY
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
LANDOLPHI v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2025cv00262
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LANDOLPHI
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
CLEMENTS v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2025cv00229
Plaintiff:
MELISSA CLEMENTS
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
ARONSON v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2025cv00218
Plaintiff:
DAVID ARONSON
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
