Maine Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 349
KELLER v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2017cv00202
Plaintiff:
BETTY KELLER
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP and WAL-MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRUNZO v. HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INC
as 2:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
LYNN M TRUNZO
Defendant:
HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. LORING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF MAINE
as 1:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
ANGELA JACKSON
Defendant:
LORING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF MAINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEPTUNE v. NICHOLAS SR et al
as 1:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B NEPTUNE
Defendant:
WILLIAM NICHOLAS SR and PASSAMAQUODDY TRIBE INDIAN TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SINGER v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
as 1:2017cv00047
Plaintiff:
DEANNA SINGER
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
LUCONTONI et al v. KENTS HILL SCHOOL et al
as 1:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
JASON LUCONTONI and DAWN LUCONTONI
Defendant:
KENTS HILL SCHOOL , COASTAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION and WILLIAM VICKERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YILMAZ v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv00565
Plaintiff:
CAROL YILMAZ
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALL et al v. DELTA AIR LINES INC et al
as 2:2016cv00417
Plaintiff:
KARL HALL and MARLENE HALL
Defendant:
DELTA AIR LINES INC and FLIGHT SERVICES & SYSTEMS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOK et al v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2016cv00381
Plaintiff:
MICHELINA COOK and JOSEPH SHEEHAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
IN RE: LAC MEGANTIC TRAIN DERAILMENT LITIGATION
as 1:2016cv01001
Plaintiff:
ALL PLAINTIFFS , ANNICK ROY, CLERMONT PEPIN and others
Defendant:
ALL DEFENDANTS , CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY LIMITED, CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Movant:
ROBERT J KEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
