Maine Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 214
CARLTON v. PFIZER INC et al
as 2:2010cv00214
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA CARLTON
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA CORPORATION and G D SEARLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHERWOOD v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC et al
as 2:2010cv00200
Plaintiff:
EMILY SHERWOOD
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC, BAYER CORPORATION and SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CABBAT v. PHILIP MORRIS USA INC
as 1:2010cv00168
Plaintiff:
BRYAN CABBAT
Defendant:
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUBERT et al v. AIRCO/BOC GROUP INC et al
as 2:2010cv00114
Plaintiff:
DANIEL A HUBERT and DAWN M HUBERT
Defendant:
AIRCO/BOC GROUP INC, HOBART BROTHERS COMPANY, ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBINSON v. PHILIP MORRIS USA INC
as 1:2010cv00075
Plaintiff:
GARY ROBINSON
Defendant:
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. FAIRBANK FARMS INC et al
as 2:2010cv00060
Plaintiff:
ALICE SMITH
Defendant:
FAIRBANK FARMS INC and FAIRBANK RECONSTRUCTION CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALKER-KETCH v. PFIZER INC et al
as 1:2010cv00036
Plaintiff:
DIANE WALKER-KETCH
Defendant:
PFIZER INC , PHARMACIA CORPORATION and G D SEARLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HILL v. PFIZER INC et al
as 2:2009cv00646
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HILL
Defendant:
PFIZER INC , PHARMACIA CORPORATION and GD SEARLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
LONG v. FAIRBANK FARMS INC et al
as 1:2009cv00592
Plaintiff:
MARGARET LONG
Defendant:
FAIRBANK FARMS INC and FAIRBANK RECONSTRUCTION CORP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
YORK v. PFIZER INC et al
as 1:2009cv00589
Plaintiff:
LARRY YORK, SR
Defendant:
PFIZER INC , PHARMACIA CORPORATION and G D SEARLE LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
