US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Kroupa v. United States Department of Justice
as 2:2015cv13607
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Kroupa
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Sheikh v. Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2015cv12247
Plaintiff:
Hasan Sheikh
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and USCIS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Powell v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2015cv11616
Plaintiff:
William E. Powell [E-Filer]
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
DONNELLY et al v. UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND
as 2:2015cv11232
Plaintiff:
ELAINE DONNELLY and CENTER FOR MILITARY READINESS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Powell v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2015cv11033
Plaintiff:
William E. Powell [E-Filer]
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Kimberg v. Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2014cv12962
Plaintiff:
Terrence Kimberg
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and USCIS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Lucaj v. United States Department of Justice, et al
as 4:2014cv12635
Plaintiff:
Doda Lucaj
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Matthews v. United States Customs and Border Protection
as 4:2014cv11150
Plaintiff:
Nigel Alfred Scott Matthews
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Kelly v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv15068
Plaintiff:
Michael A Kelly
Defendant:
Matthew Miller, Sec. Dept. of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Atty. Est. Dist. of Mich. and others
Patterson v. United States Department of Justice
as 2:2013cv14815
Petitioner:
Alfred Lawrence Patterson
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
