Michigan Contract Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 296
Negash v. DeVry University et al
as 2:2017cv10256
Plaintiff:
Abebe G. Negash [E-Filer]
Defendant:
DeVry University and Department of Education
The Lipton Law Center, P.C., a Michigan Corporation v. Citizens Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
as 2:2016cv14006
Plaintiff:
The Lipton Law Center, P.C., a Michigan Corporation
Defendant:
Citizens Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PNC Bank, National Association, successor by merger to National City Bank, a national banking association v. Legal Advocacy, P.C. et al
as 4:2016cv13258
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association, successor by merger to National City Bank, a national banking association
Defendant:
Legal Advocacy, P.C. and Norman A. Yatooma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dugan v. Vlcko
as 2:2016cv13252
Plaintiff:
Zora Dugan
Defendant:
Miroslav Vlcko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noonan v. Triton Sitework
as 2:2016cv13066
Plaintiff:
Karen Noonan
Defendant:
Triton Sitework Development, LLC and James M Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Comerica Bank, a Texas Banking Association v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
as 2:2016cv13013
Plaintiff:
Comerica Bank, a Texas Banking Association
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
People of the State of Michigan v. Roy
as 1:2016cv12614
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Michigan
Defendant:
John Roy
Talmer Bank & Trust v. Lowcountry Trading, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv12447
Plaintiff:
Talmer Bank & Trust
Defendant:
Lowcountry Trading, LLC, John G Gulbin, III, Benjamin S Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Comerica Bank, a Texas Banking Association v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
as 2:2016cv12302
Plaintiff:
Comerica Bank, a Texas Banking Association
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
