US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi Labor Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 248
Reynolds v. New Albany Saw Shop and Outdoor Equipment, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
William A Reynolds
Defendant:
New Albany Saw Shop and Outdoor Equipment, LLC and Mickey Hale
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Robbins v. Flowers Foods, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
Bradley Robbins
Defendant:
Flowers Foods, Inc. and Flowers Baking Co. of Batesville, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dorman v. Satellites Unlimited, LLC
as 4:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
Charles Dorman
Defendant:
Satellites Unlimited, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Malone et al v. Galena Corporation
as 3:2017cv00097
Plaintiff:
Ellhue Eddie Malone and Rosie Mitchell
Defendant:
Galena Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Small v. Panola County Board of Supervisors
as 3:2017cv00031
Plaintiff:
Victoria Small
Defendant:
Panola County Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
James v. Lazer Spot, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Guy James
Defendant:
Lazer Spot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hemker v. True North Earthworks, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
Joseph Donald Hemker
Defendant:
True North Earthworks, LLC and Stephen W. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Bible v. Delta Technical College, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00292
Plaintiff:
Ashley Bible
Defendant:
Delta Technical College, LLC, Midwest Technical Institute, Inc., Ralph Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Williams v. Mississippi Limestone Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv00238
Plaintiff:
Elsie Williams
Defendant:
Mississippi Limestone Corporation and Clifton Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. Town of Crowder, Mississippi et al
as 3:2016cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Clark
Defendant:
Town of Crowder, Mississippi and John Doe #1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
