US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Contract Cases

Contract Product Liability Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Almar Metals, Inc. v. Powers Fasteners, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00657
Plaintiff: Almar Metals, Inc.
Defendant: Powers Fasteners, Inc. and HNTB Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Carl E. Woodard, LLC v. Croft Metals, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00387
Plaintiff: Carl E. Woodard, LLC
Defendant: Croft Metals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Plaintiff
KLLM, Inc. v. Idling Solutions
as 3:2008cv00707
Plaintiff: KLLM, Inc.
Defendant: Idling Solutions
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Adams v. HW Gulfport Condos, LLC
as 1:2008cv00597
Plaintiff: Erik Adams
Defendant: HW Gulfport Condos, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Defendant
MSSCO Contract Sales, LLC v. Jestev Casework Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00287
Plaintiff: MSSCO Contract Sales, LLC and MSSCO Contract Sales, LLC
Defendant: Jestev Casework Company and Jestev Casework Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Payne v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00074
Plaintiff: Iley Joe Payne
Defendant: Merck & Co., Inc. and Schering-Plough Corp.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Rule et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2008cv00091
Plaintiff: Douglas Rule, Olive Rule and Shelter Insurance Company
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hospiscript Services, LLC v. Seyah Hospice Care, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00043
Defendant: Seyah Hospice Care, Inc.
Plaintiff: Hospiscript Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Caritas of Birmingham v. City of Bay St. Louis
as 1:2006cv01221
Disotell v. Miller
as 1:2007cv00646

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?