US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Labor Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 128
Palermo v. Palermo et al
as 5:2007cv00078
Plaintiff:
Richard Palermo, Richard Palermo, Sheila Palermo and others
Defendant:
LeTourneau Technologies, Inc., LeTourneau Technologies, Inc., Daniel C. Drew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Davis v. McRae's Stores Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00537
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
McRae's Stores Services, Inc., McRae's Stores Services, Inc., Belk Stores Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reliance Electric Company v. Whiting et al
as 5:2007cv00077
Plaintiff:
Reliance Electric Company
Defendant:
Ronald G. Whiting, United States Department of Labor and William Chandler
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Risher v. O'Reilly Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00047
Plaintiff:
Joyce Risher
Defendant:
O'Reilly Auto Parts, Inc., O'Reilly Auto Parts, Inc., O'Reilly Auto Parts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Palermo et al v. LeTourneau, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv00052
Plaintiff:
Richard Palermo, Richard Palermo, Sheila Palermo and others
Defendant:
LeTourneau, Inc., LeTourneau, Inc., Daniel C. Drew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 480 et al v. Multi-Con, Inc. et al
as 3:2006cv00229
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Gallender v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company et al
as 5:2005cv00220
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Braddock v. Baker Hughes Incorporated Long Term Disability Plan et al
as 2:2005cv02082
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Ladner et al v. Hancock Medical Center
as 1:2005cv00333
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
