Mississippi Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 65
Bailey Lumber & Supply Co. et al v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv01394
Plaintiff:
Bailey Lumber & Supply Co. and 84 Lumber Company
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Bluelinx Corporation and Weyerhaeuser Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Flint v. Verizon Wireless Services, LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00599
Plaintiff:
John Flint
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, AT&T Mobility, LLC, Sprint-Nextel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knight et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00592
Plaintiff:
Kenny Knight, Kenny Knight, Kenny Knight and others
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, Verizon Wireless, Inc., Sprint-Nextel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cain v. AT&T Mobility LLC. et al
as 1:2008cv00632
Plaintiff:
Rodney Cain
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC., Verizon Wireless, Inc., Sprint-Nextel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Prime Table Games, LLC et al v. Shuffle Master Corporation
as 3:2008cv00534
Plaintiff:
Prime Table Games, LLC, Derek Webb, Hannah O'Donnell and others
Defendant:
Shuffle Master Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Long v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv00028
Plaintiff:
Tammy Long and Tammy Long
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Livingston v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation et al
as 3:2006cv00144
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Woody v. Cardiology Associates of North Mississippi, P.A.
as 1:2006cv00228
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Windham Automotive Group, Inc. v. Blackmon et al
as 1:2006cv00102
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Hood v. F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd. et al
as 3:2006cv00122
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
