Mississippi Real Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Abel v. Bank of Winona et al
as 4:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Windrick Abel
Defendant:
Bank of Winona and J. Lane Greenlee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abel v. Bank of Winona et al
as 3:2016cv00192
Plaintiff:
Windrick Abel
Defendant:
Bank of Winona and J Lane Greenlee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
American Tower, L.P. v. Urban Radio Broadcasting, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00593
Plaintiff:
American Tower, L.P.
Defendant:
Urban Radio Broadcasting, LLC , Urban Radio Licenses, LLC and Urban Radio Communications, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Gullette
as 1:2015cv00224
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Marsha Brooks Gullette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. McDonald
as 3:2014cv00587
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christen C. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Thompson et al
as 1:2014cv00267
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jason Thompson and Brandy Hemelt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Williams v. AT&T Telecommunication et al
as 3:2014cv00445
Plaintiff:
Luther Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
AT&T Telecommunication and Jackson Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Missouth Properties, L.P. v. Eliska Wireless Venture I, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00408
Plaintiff:
Missouth Properties, L.P.
Defendant:
Eliska Wireless Venture I, Inc. and T-Mobile, USA, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Eliska Wireless Venture I, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Missouth Properties, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Dyes
as 1:2014cv00019
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Grace Dyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Corinth Sand, LLC v. Castano
as 1:2013cv00112
Plaintiff:
Corinth Sand, LLC
Defendant:
Ernesto Flores Castano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
