District of Montana Other Statutes Cases

Antitrust Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 11
United States of America et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana et al
as 1:2011cv00123
Plaintiff: United States of America , State of Montana
Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana , Billings Clinic , Bozeman Deaconess Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Abbott et al vs. Anesthesiologists Associated, Inc. et al
as 9:2007cv00104
Plaintiff: Daniel Abbott, Daniel Abbott, Bradford Olson and others
Defendant: Anesthesiologists Associated, Inc., Healthcenter Northwest, LLC, Kalispell Regional Medical Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Capital Radiology, PLLC vs. St Peter's Hospital, et al
as 6:2007cv00017
Defendant: St. Peter's Hospital, St. Peter's Hospital, St. Peter's Hospital and others
Plaintiff: Capital Radiology, PLLC, Capital Radiology, PLLC
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Ayres v. Missoula Anesthesiology, P. C. et al
as 9:2007cv00027
Defendant: Christopher A. Rock, M.D., Fred G. Fleming, M.D., Missoula Anesthesiology, P. C. and others
Plaintiff: Laurence Ayres, M.D., Laurence Ayres, M.D.
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Pulasky v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv00032
Defendant: NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd., Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: John Pulasky
Cause Of Action: Clayton Act
Olson v. Alliance Semiconductor Corp. et al
as 9:2006cv00195
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Kornegay v. Samsung Electronics et al
as 1:2006cv00150
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Hollywood Theatres v. Carmike Cinemas
as 2:2005cv00063
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Smith v. Brim Healthcare, et al
as 9:2005cv00071
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Davis Transport Inc., et al v. Missoula Radiology, et al
as 2:2004cv00065
Cause Of Action: Sherman-Clayton Act
1 2 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.