US District Court for the District of New Hampshire Torts - Injury Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,490
Sandsbury v. Teers et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff: Eugene Sandsbury
Defendant: John Teers and D.C.I.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boshers v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff: Kristopher Kyle Boshers
Defendant: Sig Sauer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dyson v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff: David Dyson
Defendant: Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Coloplast Corp. v. Conway, M.D.
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff: Coloplast Corp.
Defendant: Mark Conway, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Coloplast Corp. v. Conway
as 1:2024mc00019
Plaintiff: Coloplast Corp.
Defendant: Mark Conway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lovering v. Brewster Academy
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff: Lydia Lovering
Defendant: Brewster Academy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Speight v. Kaelblein et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff: Michael S. Speight
Defendant: Amanda Kaelblein, Michael Kaelblein, Nancy Kaelblein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harp et al v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff: Colton Harp, Tamra Marie Harp, Ray Tillotson and others
Defendant: Sig Sauer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vancil v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff: Michelle Vancil
Defendant: Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Renda v. Target Corporation
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff: Stefano A. Renda
Defendant: Target Corporation doing business as Target Stores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?