US District Court for the District of New Jersey Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 191 - 200 of 639
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HOLCOMBE
as 3:2015cv08807
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THOMAS L. HOLCOMBE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SAHAI et al
as 2:2015cv08796
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROONEY SAHAI, ROONEY SAHAI IRREVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST, SAHAI FAMILY TRUST and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LUKOWIAK
as 3:2015cv08716
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JEFFREY LUKOWIAK
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PRYSTOWSKY
as 2:2015cv08667
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LIGAYA Q. PRYSTOWSKY
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHANDLER
as 1:2015cv08537
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BRONELL CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6502
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HAGGINS
as 1:2015cv08378
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CARVIN HAGGINS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
BADOLATO et al v. AMERICAN PREFERRED PROVIDER PLAN INC.
as 3:2015cv08318
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. BADOLATO
Defendant:
AMERICAN PREFERRED PROVIDER PLAN INC.
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GROSS
as 1:2015cv08146
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HOWARD GROSS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KELLY et al
as 1:2015cv08068
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANNE M. KELLY, AKGG LLC, ANTHONY J. GIAMPIETRO and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARSHALL et al
as 2:2015cv08013
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN P. MARSHALL, CHERYL MARSHALL, NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
