US District Court for the District of New Jersey Other Statutes Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 1,287
NIEWENHUIS v. KENDALL et al
as 3:2021cv20513
Plaintiff:
LOREEN NIEWENHUIS
Defendant:
KEITH J. KENDALL, JOHN T. MAXWELL, DANIEL BARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NIEWENHUIS v. KENDALL et al
as 1:2021cv20513
Plaintiff:
LOREEN NIEWENHUIS
Defendant:
KEITH J. KENDALL, JOHN T. MAXWELL, DANIEL BARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MARCHESE v. JERSEY CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv20365
Plaintiff:
JAMES L MARCHESE
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, FIRST ENERGY CORP., JOHN DOES 1-25 and others
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MALIK et al
as 2:2021cv20300
Plaintiff:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
USAMA MALIK and LAUREN S WOOD
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
KARP v. INVESTORS BANCORP, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv19950
Plaintiff:
MOLLY KARP
Defendant:
INVESTORS BANCORP, INC., KEVIN CUMMINGS, JOHN E. HARMON, SR. and others
DORFMAN v. AMARIN CORPORATION PLC et al
as 3:2021cv19911
Plaintiff:
TODD DORFMAN
Defendant:
AMARIN CORPORATION PLC, JOHN F. THERO and MICHAEL W. KALB
Petitioner:
1199 SEIU HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND
ROIZMAN v. HOEGH LNG PARTNERS LP et al
as 2:2021cv19613
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR F. ROIZMAN
Defendant:
HOEGH LNG PARTNERS LP, SVEINUNG J. S. STOHLE, HAVARD FURU and others
Petitioner:
RAY F. ANDERSON
ROIZMAN v. HOEGH LNG PARTNERS LP et al
as 1:2021cv19613
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR F. ROIZMAN
Defendant:
HOEGH LNG PARTNERS LP, SVEINUNG J. S. STOHLE, HAVARD FURU and others
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. KENNETH A. WELSH
as 2:2021cv19387
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
KENNETH A. WELSH
SANCHEZ v. HOEGH LNG PARTNERS LP et al
as 2:2021cv19374
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO SANCHEZ
Defendant:
HOEGH LNG PARTNERS LP, SVEINUNG J. S. STOHLE, HAVARD FURU and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
