New Jersey Labor Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 2,391
GUEVARA v. A&F IMPERIO POBLANO LLC (DBA ANGEL LAUNDRY) et al
as 2:2023cv02950
Plaintiff:
Doris Guevara
Defendant:
A&F IMPERIO POBLANO LLC (DBA ANGEL LAUNDRY), Aracelly Gutierrez and A&F IMPERIO POBLANO LLC doing business as ANGEL LAUNDRY
PERIERA v. UNION BEVERAGE OUTLET INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02872
Plaintiff:
MANUEL PERIERA
Defendant:
UNION BEVERAGE OUTLET INC. doing business as HOME WINES AND LIQUORS and ATEF AZOUZ
YAN v. FADA GROUP INC et al
as 2:2023cv02868
Plaintiff:
QUN XUE YAN
Defendant:
FADA GROUP INC doing business as Sogo, MARK HUO and JUN LI
FEENEY et al v. GATEWAY FIRST BANK
as 2:2023cv02730
Plaintiff:
ROBERTA FEENEY and MONICA RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
GATEWAY FIRST BANK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
SHIN v. LEE et al
as 2:2023cv02694
Plaintiff:
YONGSUK SHIN
Defendant:
JUN YUP LEE and JY LEE CHIROPRACTIC LLC
RODRIGUEZ ROJAS v. EZ MART LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02642
Plaintiff:
MANUEL ALVARO RODRIGUEZ ROJAS
Defendant:
EZ MART LLC and JAGAT PARIKH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
SANCHEZ et al v. RUSSELL et al
as 2:2023cv02632
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN SANCHEZ and CRISPIN ROSAS
Defendant:
MARC RUSSELL, 557 1ST STREET CORPORATION and SKY BOY INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
CHEN et al v. RON HIBACHI GRILL SUPREME BUFFET INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02591
Plaintiff:
DAN DAN CHEN, MEI FENG LIN, XUE RAN HUANG and others
Defendant:
RON HIBACHI GRILL SUPREME BUFFET INC. D/B/A HIBACHI GRILL SUPREME BUFFET, HE PING CHEN, QI YUN CHEN and others
KUMAR v. EAGLE TRUCKLINE LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02581
Plaintiff:
RAJAT KUMAR
Defendant:
EAGLE TRUCKLINE LLC, SIMAR GILL and GURKIRAT GILL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
KRANTZ v. SMS VENTURES LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02526
Plaintiff:
Samantha Krantz
Defendant:
SMS Ventures, LLC and Saurabh Abrol
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
