New Jersey Labor Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 8,169
CAMAJ v. UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2023cv21008
Plaintiff:
Frank Camaj
Defendant:
UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TRUSTEES OF INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND AND PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE et al v. MACYS EAST, INC.
as 1:2023cv20963
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND AND PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE for and on behalf of themselves an, TRUSTEES OF INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND AND PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21
Defendant:
MACYS EAST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TRUSTEES OF INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, VACATION FUND, AND PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 FISHING TRADES INSTITUTE et al v. HEADQUARTERS HOTEL MANAGEMENT, LLC
as 1:2023cv20967
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND AND PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE for and on behalf of themselves an, TRUSTEES OF INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, VACATION FUND, AND PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 FISHING TRADES INSTITUTE and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21
Defendant:
HEADQUARTERS HOTEL MANAGEMENT, LLC D/B/A SHERATON HOTEL ATLANTIC CITY and HEADQUARTERS HOTEL MANAGEMENT, LLC doing business as SHERATON HOTEL ATLANTIC CITY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv20975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
POGREBINSKY v. NEW YORK LIFE GROUP INSURANCE COMPANY OF NY
as 2:2023cv20821
Plaintiff:
PAVEL (PAUL) POGREBINSKY
Defendant:
NEW YORK LIFE GROUP INSURANCE COMPANY OF NY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
ADVANCED SPINAL CARE & ASSOCIATES LLC v. HORIZON HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2023cv20716
Plaintiff:
ADVANCED SPINAL CARE & ASSOCIATES LLC
Defendant:
HORIZON HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. doing business as HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 312 BENEFIT FUND et al v. MERWICK CARE & REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC
as 2:2023cv20717
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 312 BENEFIT FUND, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES and UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 312
Defendant:
MERWICK CARE & REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TRUSTEES OF THE B.A.C. LOCAL 5 PENSION FUND et al v. M&M CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
as 2:2023cv20542
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE B.A.C. LOCAL 5 PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NEW JERSEY B.A.C. ANNUITY FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NEW JERSEY B.A.C. HEALTH FUND and others
Defendant:
M&M CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TRUSTEES OF THE B.A.C. LOCAL 5 PENSION FUND et al v. M&M CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
as 3:2023cv20542
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE B.A.C. LOCAL 5 PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NEW JERSEY B.A.C. ANNUITY FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NEW JERSEY B.A.C. HEALTH FUND and others
Defendant:
M&M CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
EAST COAST AESTHETIC SURGERY NJ v. WELLRITHMS, INC.
as 2:2023cv20490
Plaintiff:
EAST COAST AESTHETIC SURGERY NJ
Defendant:
WELLRITHMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
